. |
National
AU Links
National
AU Home
Press
Releses
Church
& State Magazine
About
Americans United
Resources
Legal
Information
Legislative
Update
Churches
& Politics
Religion
& Public Schools
Religious
Right Research
Faith
Communities
AU
Chapters
Ways
To Support AU
Churches
And Partisan Politics: Recipe For Division
Links of
Interest
The
Constitutional Principal
T.
Peter's Separation Page
|
AMERICANS
UNITED URGES MASSACHUSETTS COUNTY TO
CUT TIES WITH SECTARIAN DRUG COUNSELING PROGRAM
Americans United for Separation of Church & State is urging Bristol
County to discontinue its support
of a religious group's drug treatment program for former prisoners.
Massachusetts
should not be funding a religious conversion program.
According to media reports, Bristol County purchased a house for $375,000
and the county's sheriff granted it to Teen Challenge to operate a drug
recovery program for ex-inmates. Teen Challenge's drug treatment program
is based entirely on religious principles. The group's Web site states
that it "believes in the faith model and concentrates on focusing attention
on God and His will for those that enter the program." "Massachusetts
taxpayers should not be forced to support Teen Challenge's religious
mission," says Ron Madnick, president of Americans United's Massachusetts
Chapter. "The county's aid to this religious conversion program is contrary
to the constitutional principle of church-state separation. The county
should stop supporting Teen Challenge's religious work."
The
national office of Americans United sent a letter on May 2 to county
officials and the sheriff noting the unconstitutional nature of providing
a building to Teen Challenge for a religion-based drug treatment program.
"There can be no doubt that Teen Challenge's programming is permeated
by religion and that Teen Challenge attempts to convert program participants
to a particular version of Christianity," wrote Americans United attorneys
Alex Luchenitser and Dena Sher. "There can also be no doubt that providing
a building - free of charge - to house Teen Challenge's religious-indoctrination
program is a type of government assistance" that violates the First
Amendment principle of church-state separation. Americans United's letter
explains that Bristol County's support of Teen Challenge violates not
only the First Amendment, but also the Massachusetts Constitution, which
includes a provision barring "the use of public money or property" for
religious groups or causes.
The
Dover PA Evolution/Creationism Trial
In the decision
in Kitzmiller v. Dover, Judge John E. Jones III concluded,
"The proper application of both the endorsement and Lemon
tests to the facts of this case makes it abundantly clear
that the Board's ID Policy violates the Establishment Clause.
In making this determination, we have addressed the seminal
question of whether ID is science. We have concluded that
it is not, and moreover that ID cannot uncouple itself from
its creationist, and thus religious, antecedents." For
more see:
The
National Center for Science Education collection of
information on Kitzmiller v. Dover at:
http://www.ncseweb.org/kitzmiller
Judge Jones's decision in the case (PDF), at:
http://coop.www.uscourts.gov/pamd/kitzmiller_342.pdf
Federal
Court Ruling On 'Under God' In Pledge Shows Respect For Religious
Diversity
Public
Schools Should Not Require Students To Affirm Belief In God
In Order To Express Patriotism. The insertion of "under
God" into the Pledge in 1954 was in dirct conflict with
the First Amendment. The Pledge should be restored as originally
written. There can be no freedom of religion without freedom
from government promoted religion.
Supreme
Court Ducks Controversy Over Ten Commandments
The
Supreme Court decisions on display of religious symbols by
government reaffirms the important principle that the state
may not promote religion. This is a mixed verdict, but on
balance it's a win for separation of religion and government.
See also: Why
The Ten Commandments Shouldn't Be Posted In Government Buildings
Supreme
Court Ducks Controversy Over
Pledge Of Allegiance
On
June 14th the Supreme Court dismissed, on technical grounds,
a legal challenge to the use of "under God" in public
school recitations of the Pledge of Allegiance. It ignored
the first Amendment, "Congress shall make no law respecting
an establishment of religion,..." which Congress blatantly
violated in 1954 when it added "under God" to the
Pledge.
|
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| "Believing
with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between man
and his God; that he owes account to none other for his faith or
his worship; that the legislative powers of the government reach
actions only, and not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence
that act of the whole American people which declared that their
legislature should `make no law respecting an establishment of religion,
or prohibiting the free exercise thereof," thus building a wall
of separation between church and State."
Thomas Jefferson, Danbury
Letter, 1802 |
"The
purpose of separation of church and state is to keep forever from these
shores the ceaseless strife that has soaked the soil of Europe in blood
for centuries."
--
James Madison, letter objecting to the use of government land for churches,
1803
"To
compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of
opinions which he disbelieves and abhors, is sinful and tyrannical."
--Thomas Jefferson: Bill for Religious Freedom, 1779. Papers 2:545
|